This website uses non-intrusive cookies to improve your user experience. You can visit our cookie privacy page for more information.

Social media

Javascript is required to use HSE website social media functionality.

Rule against hearsay

Definition

1. Section 114 The Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003) defines hearsay evidence as any ‘statement not made in oral evidence in the proceedings.’ Reliance on a statement made otherwise than while giving evidence to prove the truth of a fact asserted remains hearsay.

2. The general rule is that such a statement is inadmissible as evidence of the truth of the facts stated. 1

3. The rule applies:

4. If either the prosecution or the defence want to introduce hearsay evidence, within the meaning of section 114 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, notice must be given to the court and all other parties. If a party objects to the introduction of such evidence, that party must apply to the Court to determine the objection.

5. There are strict time limits in relation to the serving of hearsay notices and applications for objection. More detail about the process can be found within Part 34 of the Criminal Procedure Rules 2013. If you have evidence that you consider may be hearsay, you should discuss it with your line management and, if there is no Solicitor Agent instructed in your case, contact your legal liaison point for advice who may in turn contact the Legal Adviser’s Office.


Footnote

  1. R v Sharp [1988] 1 All ER 65, HL; [1988] 1 WLR 7 at 11; Subramanian v Public Prosecutor [1956] 1 WLR 965 at 970; R v Kearley [1992] 2 WLR 656 (at 676B and E.), HL.
Updated 2013-12-17