This website uses non-intrusive cookies to improve your user experience. You can visit our cookie privacy page for more information.

Beta This is a new way of showing guidance - your feedback will help us improve it.

HSE Statistics cross iconNon-fatal injuries at work in Great Britain

581,000
Workers sustained a non-fatal injury according to self-reports from the Labour Force Survey in 2018/19 (LFS)

69,208
Employee non-fatal injuries reported by employers in 2018/19 (RIDDOR)

Self-reported non-fatal injuries by length of absence from work

(LFS estimate, 2018/19)

Graph showing that injuries with up to 7 days absence is the largest category at 443,000

Non-fatal injuries to employees by most common accident kinds

(Non-fatal injuries reported under RIDDOR 2018/19, includes those accident kinds that account for 5% or more of the total)

Graph showing slips trips or falls on the same level, are the most common type of non-fatal accident at 29%

Rate of self-reported workplace non-fatal injury

(LFS: Estimated rate per 100,000 workers)

Graph showing a downward trend in the rate of self-reported non-fatal injuries

Rate of employer-reported non-fatal injury

(RIDDOR: Rate per 100,000 employees)

Graph showing an downward trend in the rate of employer-reported non-fatal injuries

Notes

The Labour Force Survey (LFS) provides the most complete estimate of non-fatal injuries to workers, providing an estimate of all injuries sustained (based on self-reports by workers).

This data is supplemented with reports by employers of workplace injuries under the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations (RIDDOR).  RIDDOR requires employers to report certain workplace non-fatal injuries, generally the more serious (those that result in more than 7 days absence from work or specified on a pre-defined list of injuries). It is known that employers substantially under-report these non-fatal injuries: current levels of overall employer reporting of RIDDOR defined non-fatal injuries to employees is estimated at around a half; and the reporting of injuries to the self-employed a much lower proportion. Any comparisons between different subsets within RIDDOR data (e.g. comparisons between one industrial sector and another) need to take account of the possibility of there being markedly different reporting levels in the subsets being compared.

LFS data has several advantages over RIDDOR including: data are available for all workplace injuries, irrespective of time off work; they are not subject to the substantial under-reporting that affects RIDDOR; and they are not affected by changes in legislation.  However, RIDDOR provides greater richness in terms of details about the injury sustained.

Updated 2019-10-18