|Health and Safety Executive - Safety Notice|
|Department Name:||Field Operations Directorate - Construction Sector|
|Bulletin No:||FOD 1-2015|
|Issue Date:||18 May 2015|
|Target Audience:||Manufacturers, importers of Earth moving machinery and derivative machinery designed and constructed to the standard EN 474-1:2006 +A4:2013.
Those responsible for the procurement of relevant machinery including those in the Engineering, Construction, Metals and Minerals Processing and Production, Quarries, Agriculture and Mining industries
|Key Issues:||Action to be taken by all manufacturers which supply relevant product to the UK market should ensure compliance with the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC in respect of visibility from machines, in the temporary absence of an applicable transposed harmonised standard.|
On 28 January 2015, a warning published in the Official Journal (OJ) of the European Commission came into effect removing the presumption of conformity from EN 474-1:2006 +A4:2013 Earth Moving Machinery – Safety – General Requirements in respect of visibility. This means that compliance with this standard will no longer automatically assure compliance with the Essential Health and Safety Requirements (EHSRs) of the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC, particularly EHSR 3.2.1. Driving Position, concerning visibility from the operator’s position.
Clause 5.8 of BS EN 474-1:2006 +A4:2013 makes a normative reference to ISO 5006:2006 Earth Moving Machinery – Operator’s Field of View – Test Method and Performance Criteria. Prior to the publication of the warning this conferred a presumption of conformity with the Machinery Directive.
By issuing the warning the European Commission has withdrawn the presumption of conformity in respect of visibility because it believes that:
Both CEN and ISO are in the process of amending both standards to reinstate the presumption of conformity of EN474 – 1 with the Machinery Directive.
Manufacturers and importers of Earth Moving Machinery within the scope of EN 474-1 should review the conformity assessment of their product ranges in respect of visibility from the operator’s position to ensure continued compliance. Where necessary they should then implement improvements to affected products. The review of the conformity assessment can be undertaken directly with the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC, in particular EHSRs 3.2.1. Operator’s Position, 1.1.2 (b) Principles of Safety Integration, and 220.127.116.11 (l) Contents of Instructions, and fully consider the state of the art. Manufacturers may wish to work towards the recommendations proposed in the amended standards, as they are developed, as part of their conformity assessment.
The review should take into account:
HSE recognises that the design of many current models of Earth Moving Machinery are driven by the requirements of ISO 5006, and that it may not be possible to respond to a step change in requirements immediately. Where this is the case, manufacturers should work towards the implementation of necessary changes to the design and user instructions using a risk assessment approach. This is likely to address machines with significant maskings, (blind spots) for example, when reversing. Where design improvements cannot be made in the short term, then manufacturers should revise their instructions to inform users of residual risk (see Appendix 1).
The relevant legal documents are;
The Machinery Directive makes it clear that market surveillance authorities such as HSE must presume that products are compliant unless they have good reason to believe otherwise. However, HSE may request copies of manufacturer’s Technical Files and may also undertake market surveillance activities. HSE may take enforcement action against manufacturers and suppliers where products are demonstrably unsafe, or require improvement of non-conforming products.
Health and Safety Executive online advice form
Reliance cannot be placed solely on equipment fully meeting EHSRs. The law requires operators/users of this type of equipment to undertake suitable and sufficient risk assessments to determine how the machinery should be used safely. Operators/users may fit additional visibility aids (e.g. CCTV) to a machine if it is identified that these are needed through the risk assessment process. Where earth moving machinery has been properly assessed, the job suitably planned and safe systems of work introduced (pedestrian segregation, etc), then it should be possible to operate the plant safely, despite the withdrawal of the presumption of conformity.
A warning has been placed in the Official Journal of the European commission regarding the lack of conformity for visibility requirements covering machines designed to EN474-1 and compliance with the Machinery Directive. Manufacturers and suppliers of Earth Moving Machinery and derivative machinery should note the following Essential Health and Safety Requirements, EHSRs of the directive
HSE expects that manufacturers will follow the normal iterative design process outlined in the BS EN 12100 series of standards to eliminate, reduce and mitigate against risks, including those related to movement of vehicles and visibility, to the lowest level which is reasonably practicable.
Information on residual risk must be effectively communicated to those who purchase equipment. HSE believes that an effective way to meet the EHSRs is to provide those who purchase machinery with a diagram or visibility map illustrating the significant maskings (blind spots) around the Earth Moving Machine. Manufacturers may choose an alternative but equally effective route to communicate residual risk.
For consistency, guidelines for the visibility map are set out below, with a suggested presentation format:
1. The map should show approximate maskings (blindspots) between the 1m rectangular boundary and the 12 m circular boundary as shown in ISO 5006:2006. For larger machines (those machines where there are no specified performance requirements stipulated in the standard) the circular boundary should extend to 24 m.
2. The map should represent the base machine in the travel position with attachments as sold. It should not include the improved visibility performance produced using additional aids which are optional. The manufacturer may wish to supply enhanced visibility maps showing the reduction in blindspots where additional aids are provided. For machines sold without attachments then a visibility map should be provided for the largest attachment recommended by the manufacturer which restricts operator visibility to the greatest extent.
3. On each visibility map the following should be specified
The visibility map should be included in the operators manual.