Bristol machining company fined after employee suffers serious injuries

Date:

11 June 2012

A Brislington-based machining company has been prosecuted for failing to adequately guard dangerous parts of machinery resulting in a worker suffering serious head and chest injuries.

Bristol Magistrates Court heard today (11 June) that 34 year old Ian Spicer, from Hartcliffe in Bristol, was operating a Computer Numerically Controlled (CNC) lathe machine at Mil Tu Fit Engineering Ltd when the incident happened on 30 August 2011.

During an investigation, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) discovered that the company had two CNC lathes on site, one intended for machining short parts only and another with a bar feed attachment and guard designed for machining longer parts. Because the machine for longer parts was already in use, Mr Spicer was instructed to use the lathe without the bar feed attachment to machine long metal bars at roughly 2.5 metres in length.

The court was told that, Mr Spicer was advised to place a barrier of empty drums at the end of the machine in order to fence off the rotating bar from passers-by - a method that Mil Tu Fit Engineering had used in the past. However, as the machine was operating, the bar became unstable and began to bend under its own weight. As Mr Spicer turned to see what was happening, he was struck by the bar which threw him to the ground and knocked him unconscious.

Mr Spicer sustained a compressed skull fracture, which had partly shattered and concaved his skull, leaving fragments resting on his brain. He also suffered wide gashes to his chest, a dislodged breast plate, broken wrist, and several other smaller wounds on his body.

Speaking after the prosecution, HSE inspector Mehtaab Hamid said:

"Although the barriers Mr Spicer's employers advised to set up might have prevented other employees from accessing the bar from the side and rear of the machine, they offered no protection for the machine's operator, and did not support the bar which was spinning at extremely high speeds.

"Mr. Spicer's injuries were extremely serious. He has returned to work, but not in his previous role as machine operator and only on a part time basis. Some nine months after the incident, Mr Spicer is still suffering from severe headaches, chest, back and joint pains, as well as dizziness and flashbacks. At this point, his work future is uncertain.

"Had the company used the appropriate equipment which was available on site, this incident could have been avoided and Mr Spicer would not have suffered these terrible injuries."

Mil Tu Fit Engineering Ltd, of 246 Broomhill Road, Brislington, Bristol, BS4 5RG, was found guilty of breaching Regulation 11(1)(a) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998. The company was fined a total of £10,000 and ordered to pay £3,632 in costs.

Notes to editors

1. The Health and Safety Executive is Britain's national regulator for workplace health and safety. It aims to reduce work-related death, injury and ill health. It does so through research, information and advice; promoting training; new or revised regulations and codes of practice; and working with local authority partners by inspection, investigation and enforcement. www.hse.gov.uk
2. Section 11(1)(a) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 states that: Every employer shall ensure that measures are taken in accordance with paragraph (2) which are effective:
   1. to prevent access to any dangerous part of machinery or to any rotating stock-bar; or
   2. to stop the movement of any dangerous part of machinery or rotating stock-bar before any part of a person enters a danger zone.
   (2) The measures required by paragraph (1) shall consist of:
   1. the provision of fixed guards enclosing every dangerous part or rotating stock-bar where and to the extent that it is practicable to do so, but where or to the extent that it is not, then
   2. the provision of other guards or protection devices where and to the extent that it is practicable to do so, but where or to the extent that it is not, then
   3. the provision of jigs, holders, push-sticks or similar protection appliances used in conjunction with the machinery where and to the extent that it is practicable to do so, but where or to the extent that it is not, then
   4. the provision of information, instruction, training and supervision.

Press enquiries

Regional reporters should call the appropriate Regional News Network press office.

Issued on behalf of the Health and Safety Executive by COI News and PR (South West)