This website uses non-intrusive cookies to improve your user experience. You can visit our cookie privacy page for more information.

The Applicant Guide: How do I generate data on environmental exposure, ecotoxicology and efficacy?

How do I generate data on environmental exposure?

What data are used in the assessment of environmental exposure?

Full details on the requirement and generation of data are given at:>

How do I generate data to address ecotoxicology?

What data are used in the assessment of ecotoxicology?

Data and other information used to assess the risk to non-target organisms resulting from the use of the product as recommended on the label (eg small mammals, birds, aquatic life, non-target arthropods, honeybees, earthworms, soil microbial processes and non-target terrestrial plants).

Guidance on data requirements:

  1. Guidance on the ecotoxicology data requirements for active substances are given on the European Commission website.
  2. Further guidance is available on this website: Ecotoxicology guidance.

Arrangements are in place to ensure that tests involving vertebrates are not repeated unnecessarily. Full details of this procedure are given in The Applicant Guide: The Protection of Data (under "Vertebrate data sharing provisions under Regulation 1107/2009 - data protection and data sharing")

Applications for which an ecotoxicology assessment is necessary

An assessment is necessary to address the risk from all new products, new uses of existing products (including increase in application rates, change in time of application, new crops etc) and any changes to existing conditions of authorisation or other label claims/recommendation which may affect exposure of non-target organisms.

Examples of how these changes may increase exposure and risk to non-target organisms include:

  1. Higher application rates may increase the risk to all areas of concern, (eg an increase in seed loading may increase the risk to birds, whereas an increase in the application rate of a spray may increase the risk to aquatic life).
  2. Changes to recommended timings (ie time of application or crop stage) may increase the risk to non-target organisms, (eg a change in the time of use to cover a change in season could increase the risk to non-target arthropods. Likewise, use on cereals at an earlier growth stage may result in an increased exposure of grazing birds).
  3. Other examples of new uses where the risk to non-target organisms must be addressed including the following:
    1. Pre flowering/flowering uses if the hazard ratio for bees is >50.
    2. New use during 1 April to 30 September if the hazard ratio for bees is >50.
    3. Use in orchards and other perennial crops.
    4. Forestry use including trees, shrubs and hedges.
    5. Use in or near water courses.
    6. Use in water where previously label recommended only near water.
    7. Post harvest use on vegetables which may be washed commercially.
    8. Use as a bulb dip prior to planting.
    9. Early emergence of oilseed rape, legumes, beet crops, vegetable crops, grass leys, brassicas and other crops where foliage may be grazed.
  4. If a new product results from a change in the formulation of an existing product, then there may be an increase in the risk to non-target organisms.

How will the ecotoxicology assessment be carried out?

New uses never previously considered

If you are making an application to the Pesticides Branch for the authorisation of new uses or products which have never previously been considered by CRD, applicants should include an assessment of the risk to non-target organisms, ie small mammals, birds, aquatic life, honeybees and other non-target arthropods, earthworms, soil microbial processes and non-target terrestrial plants. The risk that a use poses should be assessed in line with Regulation 1107/2009 and associated guidance, such as the EFSA guidance for the risk assessment of birds and mammals (EFSA, 2009, 7(12)1438). Further information can be found in the Ecotoxicology section. You should submit data used as a basis of the risk assessment with the application.

Extrapolation of previous risk assessment

Where the proposed use involves an active substance previously authorised in another product for the same or similar uses, it may be possible to extrapolate data to the proposed use where there is access to the relevant data. You should address whether the rates and timings of the proposed use are within those already authorised for the same or a comparable use in an authorised formulation (preferably as a tabulated comparison). Any differences between the proposed and approved uses should be addressed with data or a reasoned case. In addition, you should present reasoned cases explaining why extrapolation of data between different formulations is acceptable (advice on comparison of different formulations is given in the section 'Formulation changes' below).

Formulation changes

You should address the effect of formulation changes on both the hazard classification, with respect to aquatic life, and the risk to aquatic life and other non-target organisms. Depending on the nature of the change, new data or a reasoned case for extrapolation of previously evaluated active substance or product-related data should be submitted.

For many formulation changes a reasoned case may be presented as a comparison between the active substance and co-formulant content of the formulations. Material Safety Data Sheets for the co-formulants or other information on their ecotoxicology should be used to address whether the change will affect the product hazard classification or the risk to non-target organisms resulting from use.

For major changes in formulation type, (eg from a liquid formulation to a granule), new data may be required to enable the risk to non-target organisms to be fully addressed.

How do I generate data to address efficacy?

What data are used in the assessment of efficacy?

The efficacy evaluation ensures that when pesticides are used as recommended on the label, a consistent benefit is achieved. We use data and other information to assess effectiveness and crop safety of the formulation. This is dependent on the formulation itself, applied dose, timing and methods of application, dilution volumes and other recommendations specified in the 'DIRECTIONS FOR USE' section of the label. In addition to the need to demonstrate consistent control of the target organism, no unacceptable effects on yield and quality of the treated and non-target crops should be seen. Any risk of resistance to the pesticide developing in the target organism should be addressed.

Guidance on data requirements:

  1. Details of efficacy data requirements are given on the European Commission website.
  2. Extensive guidance is given in The Efficacy Guidelines.

Further Information

Updated 2016-11-07