Health and Safety Executive

Further information on ageing and life extension

What are ageing and life extension?

Ageing equipment or structure is that for which there is evidence or likelihood of significant deterioration and damage taking place since new, or for which there is insufficient information and knowledge available to know the extent to which this possibility exists.  It is not necessarily characterised by physical age.

Life extension refers to continued operation of an installation beyond the design life assumed at the time of design or revised following a reassessment.

The bathtub curve

Bathtub curve

The ageing process is depicted simply and effectively by the ‘bathtub curve’.  This shows the following characteristics:

  • possible initial failures associated mainly with fabrication defects;
  • the occurrence of failures associated with inevitable operational wear and tear;
  • accelerated failure and a loss of integrity associated with the onset of ageing.

A suitable asset integrity management programme should ensure that loss of integrity due to ageing does not occur during the design life of the component or structure.

Integrity performance during life extension phase

Intergrity performance

Figure 2 illustrates possible variations of deterioration of integrity with time.  The principal concern for ageing installations is the increased uncertainty associated with their performance in the later stages, characterised by the life extension phase.

Key issues for ageing installations

Ageing processes can be considered as systematic changes that alter the risk profile of an installation.  The integrity management of ageing installations and the successful implementation of an asset integrity management plan for life extension require consideration of:

  • accumulating or accelerating damage / deterioration;
  • modifications;
  • obsolescence;
  • changes of process & / or well conditions;
  • advances in knowledge and technology;
  • organisational changes / loss of corporate knowledge.

and depend on:

  • understanding the degradation processes;
  • accurate knowledge of the condition of a structure / component;
  • knowledge of the response of the structure in the aged condition;
  • an implementation strategy (including a gap analysis identifying the differences between current practice and good practice);
  • re-evaluation of the risk to ensure that any increased likelihood of deterioration can be predicted, detected and assessed. 

Further information can be found on the publications webpage and in the KP4 Policy and KP4 Strategy documents.


Directgov - Business Link

Updated 19.01.11