Health and Safety
Executive / Commission
Legionnaires
Factors to take into account in reaching an informed judgement whether or not to remove the fill pack for cleaning.
Does the initial legionellosis risk assessment identify the cleanliness of the fill pack as a significant risk factor?
What is the additional legionellosis risk (if any) to operators and others resulting from cleaning?
What are the risks of the following when removing and reinstalling the fill pack?
Is there space to remove, clean and reinstall the fill pack?
How disruptive would removing and reinstalling the fill pack be to the business?
Does the initial legionellosis risk assessment advocate a frequency for fill pack removal?
What are the findings of the monthly to quarterly visual inspections advocated in L8?
Have there been changes in operation, treatment, control, contractors or the environment (e.g. nearby building or demolition works)?
How well has the system conformed to its performance targets for important parameters such as levels of hardness, inhibitor, dissolved solids, biocide, bacteria (including legionella) and contaminants?
How long will it take to make arrangements for fill pack removal and cleaning if it is deemed necessary?
What is the condition of the pack?
Remove and inspect a representative sample, for example by:
Consider other information which may be useful in indicating that there may be deposits, for example:
If the findings are that the pack has significant deposits, a cleanliness appraisal should be made of the heat exchanger. Consideration should also be given to a review of the water treatment regime. This might involve more frequent cleaning of the tower and/or the implementation of supplementary measures, such as side-stream filtration.
If the fill pack is scaled or fouled and it is reasonably practicable to do so, remove it.
Reasonably practicable means, in essence, that you must do everything that can be done to reduce risk to its lowest possible level, except that you don’t have to do something where its cost is clearly excessive compared to the size of the risk reduction.
For a cooling tower serving the air conditioning in a typical office block, removing and reinstalling the fill pack could amount to a day’s work for two men and would cause some damage to the pack, probably requiring partial replacement. This on its own would not be deemed to constitute a prohibitive cost.
If the heat exchanger can not be shown to be clean, it should also be cleaned.
If the pack is demonstrably clean, record its condition including evidence such as photographs, weights etc and leave it in place for cleaning.
If the fill pack is scaled or fouled and it is reasonably practicable to do so, remove it.
To reach the judgement that removing the pack is not reasonably practicable (rather than just inconvenient), there must be substantial and demonstrable disadvantages or costs which outweigh the advantages of removal and reinstallation.
If the heat exchanger can not be shown to be clean, it should also be cleaned.
The guidance in L8 should be met or exceeded by site or system specific method statements. Risk assessments are required for all reasonably foreseeable hazards, suitable and sufficient precautions must be taken as necessary.