This circular gives advice to all visiting staff including local authority enforcement officers.
1.1 This guidance should be used by all local authorities (LAs) for the selection of Reporting of Injuries, Deaths and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 1995 (RIDDOR) notifications. It provides a common proportionate, transparent and targeted procedure for the selection and investigation of accidents and incidents. Using this procedure or adopting an equivalent approach which mirrors it, will support LAs in their duty to 'make adequate arrangements for enforcement' under Section 18 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (HSWA). This guidance aims to provide an approach for LAs which is consistent with the Health and Safety Executive’s (HSE) Field Operations Directorate (FOD).
2.1 This guidance applies to the handling of all notified incidents received by LAs whether reportable or not.
2.2 This guidance does not extend to circumstances where other regulatory frameworks are best placed to deal with the potential breaches of the law e.g. trading standards, food safety.
3.1 Incidents should be selected for investigation with consideration of HSE’s Enforcement Policy Statement (EPS). LAs will, in accordance with their duty under Section 18, allocate sufficient time and resources to investigate accidents, dangerous occurrences and causes of occupational ill health. When deciding which incidents to investigate and the level of resource to be allocated to the investigation, account should be taken of the:
3.2 In certain cases LAs may decide not to investigate an incident in the Mandatory category. (See Section 6.0 Non–investigation of a mandatory incident)
3.3 Not every incident reported to LAs will require investigation after initial enquiries have been made. The criteria for selecting incidents suitable for further investigation are detailed below. (See Section 7.0 Discretionary Investigations)
4.1 Incidents relating to accidents, dangerous occurrences and occupational ill health will come to the local authority’s attention through the RIDDOR notification database, complaints, officer visits or enquiries from Solicitors acting on behalf of an injured party etc. To clarify see Investigation Flow Chart (Appendix B ).
4.2 Where the Incident Contact Centre (ICC) or online reporting is used to report incidents, details will be accessible to LAs via the RIDDOR notification database. This should be checked regularly and incidents either accepted or reallocated as appropriate using the relevant enforcing authority guidance.
4.3 Where the ICC or online reporting has not been used, LAs should ensure that all notifiable incidents reported directly to them are input on the RIDDOR notification database. This should be completed by the relevant Enforcing Authority, LA or HSE.
4.4. All incidents received should be considered by the competent nominated person (Team Leader/Senior/Principal EHO) made responsible for allocating incidents who will decide what incidents are investigated based on the criteria outlined in this guidance, and allocate appropriate field staff to make initial enquiries and/or investigate further as appropriate.
4.5 All administrative staff who handle incident notifications should be familiar with the key aspects of this guidance so urgent notifications such as fatalities and multiple serious injuries are brought to the nominated competent person’s attention as a matter of priority.
4.6 If an incident is selected for investigation the competent nominated person should record the decision and allocate the investigation to an appropriate investigating officer. Section A of the Investigation Selection Recording Form attached at Appendix A is for this purpose and should be included with the RIDDOR report and related information which is passed to the investigating officer.
4.7 If further information is required in order to effectively investigate, the injured party/employer/member of the public can be contacted using the Standard Letters attached at Appendix C .
The following defined major incidents should always be investigated:
5. 1 Fatalities (Work-related deaths):
*In some circumstances e.g. in health or social care, the risk of suicide may arise from the work activity. In such cases, the HSC/E guidance on the application of HSWA section 3 should be applied. This guidance also clarifies those circumstances when investigation by enforcing authorities is appropriate e.g. in relation to areas regulated by other regulators and legislative regimes, such as clinical judgment and practice. See: Enforcement - Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 - Section 3
5. 2 All work-related accidents resulting in a “Specified Injury” [RIDDOR Reg. 4(1)] to any person, including non-workers, that meet any of the following conditions:
5.3 Cases of Occupational Disease:
The following notifications of cases of occupational disease, other than those arising from circumstances or situations which have already been investigated:
5. 4 Incidents which indicate a likelihood of a serious breach of health and safety law:
This includes any incidents considered liable to give rise to serious public concern, where, from the facts known, the application of the Enforcement Management Model would give rise to an initial enforcement expectation of a notice or a prosecution.
5. 5 Major hazard precursor events:
All relevant precursor events as identified within the HSE business plan, and the relevant work plans of each HSE Operational Directorate.
6.1 For any mandatory incident that is not investigated, a Decision Recording Form (DRF) (Appendix A , Section B) or a local equivalent should be completed to explain the reasons for non-investigation. A senior manager (Head of Service) should be involved in any decision with the competent nominated person. LAs should adhere to this principle of recording decisions and having them signed off by a senior manager.
6.2 The grounds for not investigating incidents that would normally be investigated may include:
7.1 Those incidents not falling into the above criteria for mandatory investigation may be investigated at the local authority’s discretion when taking into account the following factors: