This website uses non-intrusive cookies to improve your user experience. You can visit our cookie privacy page for more information.

Assuring the independence of prosecution decisions

Formerly OC 168/9

Summary

These guidelines apply to all prosecution cases, including those subject to independent legal oversight. They are intended to help ensure that prosecution decisions involve an independent review of the evidential sufficiency and public interest. In many cases taken by HSE this decision can be properly taken by the investigating inspector's line manager.

Introduction 

The person making the prosecution decision, the Approval Officer (AO), must do so in a fair, independent and objective way so that they are not affected by improper or undue pressure from any source. They should therefore not be closely involved in directing, or be taking part in the investigation process. However they can, and should be involved, if necessary, in advising the investigating inspector on lines of enquiry. Neither does the normal management role of Band 1 or 2 staff in monitoring the investigation work of inspectors compromise their ability to make the prosecution decision.

Action 

Before approving prosecutions, AO’s should consider the following criteria. If they judge that one or more of the criteria apply to them in a way that could compromise their independence they should refer the case(s) to another AO:

  1. has controlled and directed the investigation beyond performing the manager's role of ensuring the investigation was properly conducted and meets HSE's standards of performance;
  2. has been directly involved in securing evidence, such as assisting in taking witness statements or conducting or assisting in PACE interviews with potential defendants or their representatives;
  3. has had significant prior dealings with any potential defendants, e.g. as a result of contact on operational matters or through sector or other representational work;
  4. has become the "public face of HSE" as a result of direct and ongoing publicity following an incident, as distinct from simply an immediate media response following an incident;
  5. has become directly involved with the potential defendant at Board (or equivalent) level in agreeing remedial measures following an incident,[or has been subjected to a formal approach by a potential defendant or their legal representative to consider alternative action to that of prosecution], or
  6. has been closely involved with victims, their relatives or other agents acting on their behalf, e.g. discussing requests for HSE to take enforcement action beyond any initial expression of expectation that HSE will take such action.

Background 

None

Organisation 

Targeting

Not applicable

Timing

Not applicable

Resources

Not applicable

Recording & Reporting

Nothing outside the requirements of the combined investigation/prosecution report.

Health & Safety

Not applicable

Diversity

Not applicable

Further References 

Contacts 

Legal and Enforcement Team, VPN 523 3337.

Updated 2014-06-25