This data covers the period 1st April 2010 to 31st March 2011.
The following four tables illustrate the diverse makeup of our organisation as at 31 March 2011 when our workforce was 3,602.
All tables read across from junior staff at Band 6 through to senior staff at SCS.
| *Band 6 | *Band 5 | *Band 4 | *Band 3 | *Band 2 | *Band 1 | *SCS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Total staff in post by job band | Admin Officer equiv | Executive Officer equiv | Higher Executive Officer equiv | Senior Executive Officer equiv | Grade 7 equiv | Grade 6 equiv | SCS | Totals |
| 16-24 | 37 | 35.14% | 37.84% | 18.92% | 8.11% | 100% | |||
| 25-29 | 159 | 30.82% | 22.01% | 27.67% | 18.87% | 0.63% | 100% | ||
| 30-34 | 314 | 13.06% | 13.38% | 20.70% | 47.45% | 4.78% | 0.64% | 100% | |
| 35-39 | 421 | 12.59% | 15.68% | 14.01% | 50.36% | 6.18% | 1.19% | 100% | |
| 40-44 | 619 | 14.31% | 18.37% | 14.63% | 37.72% | 12.85% | 2.11% | 0.65% | 100% |
| 45-49 | 727 | 15.14% | 14.17% | 15.42% | 35.28% | 16.11% | 3.89% | 0.97% | 100% |
| 50-54 | 627 | 17.75% | 14.01% | 10.10% | 34.36% | 19.54% | 4.23% | 2.12% | 100% |
| 55-59 | 452 | 13.24% | 10.96% | 7.99% | 28.31% | 31.96% | 7.53% | 3.20% | 100% |
| 60-64 | 235 | 18.42% | 10.96% | 6.14% | 32.46% | 24.56% | 7.46% | 3.07% | 100% |
| 65+ | 11 | 54.55% | 18.18% | 18.18% | 9.09% | 100% |
| *Band 6 | *Band 5 | *Band 4 | *Band 3 | *Band 2 | *Band 1 | *SCS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Total staff in post by gender | Admin Officer equiv | Executive Officer equiv | Higher Executive Officer equiv | Senior Executive Officer equiv | Grade 7 equiv | Grade 6 equiv | SCS | Totals |
| Female | 1646 | 25.17% | 22.24% | 14.84% | 28.22% | 7.51% | 2.02% | 0.55% | 100% |
| Male | 1956 | 8.13% | 8.70% | 12.71% | 43.18% | 22.50% | 4.79% | 1.88% | 100% |
| *Band 6 | *Band 5 | *Band 4 | *Band 3 | *Band 2 | *Band 1 | *SCS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethnicity | Total staff in post by ethnicity | Admin Officer equiv | Executive Officer equiv | Higher Executive Officer equiv | Senior Executive Officer equiv | Grade 7 equiv | Grade 6 equiv | SCS | Totals |
| BME | 135 | 15.56% | 23.70% | 11.85% | 37.04% | 10.37% | 1.48% | 100% | |
| White | 2236 | 14.78% | 14.78% | 13.47% | 36.33% | 16.33% | 4.31% | 1.41% | 100% |
| Not stated | 1231 | 18.16% | 14.22% | 14.30% | 36.15% | 14.87% | 2.30% | 1.15% | 100% |
| *Band 6 | *Band 5 | *Band 4 | *Band 3 | *Band 2 | *Band 1 | *SCS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability | Total staff in post by disability | Admin Officer equiv | Executive Officer equiv | Higher Executive Officer equiv | Senior Executive Officer equiv | Grade 7 equiv | Grade 6 equiv | SCS | Totals |
| Yes | 139 | 32.12% | 13.87% | 16.79% | 25.55% | 11.68% | 1.46% | 100% | |
| No | 3149 | 15.34% | 15.34% | 12.67% | 36.56% | 16.33% | 3.76% | 1.25% | 100% |
| Not stated | 314 | 15.16% | 11.29% | 22.58% | 38.39% | 10.00% | 2.58% | 1.29% | 100% |
The Government's recruitment freeze means we have done very little recruitment over the last year, so we are still reviewing the effectiveness and value of many of these initiatives, and we will continue to explore new options for encouraging people to consider a career with HSE:
The following four tables illustrate the recruitment into HSE during the period 1 April 2010 - 31 March 2011. HSE recruited 140 people during 2010/11
| Age range | % Count |
|---|---|
| 16-24 | 11.43% |
| 25-29 | 12.86% |
| 30-34 | 14.29% |
| 35-39 | 15.71% |
| 40-44 | 15.71% |
| 45-49 | 12.86% |
| 50-54 | 13.57% |
| 55-59 | 1.43% |
| 60-64 | 2.14% |
| 65+ | 0.00% |
The nature of HSE's work means that we recruit people across the age ranges. We recruit people of all ages for our non-technical posts. For our regulators, who have to successfully complete a postgraduate diploma training course, we look for people who have the relevant background and experience so ages can vary. In addition for our specialists we need people with the skills and knowledge gained through working in their relevant field. Our specialist recruits are, therefore, often more mature (nuclear, offshore, mechanical engineering etc) as the level of specialist knowledge we need these people to have will often have taken many years to develop.
| Table 6 - Recruitment by gender | Table 7 - Recruitment by ethnicity | Table 8 - Recruitment by disability | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | % Count | Ethnicity | % Count | Disability | % Count | ||
| Female | 37.14% | BME | 4.29% | Yes | 0.71% | ||
| Male | 62.86% | White | 34.29% | No | 53.57% | ||
| Not stated | 61.43% | Not stated | 45.71% | ||||
The nature of HSE's work is often highly specialised; we recruit people with specialist skills and expertise gained during many years in their industry. Many of these areas of specialism can still be more predominantly male rather than female; the number of people of ethnic minority has historically been low in these fields; and disability rates are also low. Each of these factors impacts on the diverse make-up of the groups of people who have the skills and expertise HSE requires to operate effectively.
Using employment information from the Annual Population Survey (APS) we have isolated demographic structures of individuals working in key occupations relevant to HSE, and compared them with that of all workers in Great Britain. The key occupations that we have chosen are those that exhibit the specialist skills required for the job roles at HSE.
Due to insufficient sample numbers, it is not possible to look at only those with a given level of prior work experience, so the data below reflects all individuals working in the key HSE occupations rather than only those with a higher level of experience.
Employment data is based on a 3 year average, using data from 2008 to 2010. The occupations grouped together for the HSE occupation list are as follows:
| Gender | HSE Occupations | GB All Occupations |
|---|---|---|
| Male | 74% | 53% |
| Female | 26% | 47% |
Those working in the HSE key occupations are predominantly male - 74% instead of 53%, which is the GB average for those in employment.
| Age Group | HSE Occupations | GB All Occupations |
|---|---|---|
| 16-24 | 5% | 13% |
| 25-29 | 12% | 11% |
| 30-34 | 13% | 10% |
| 35-39 | 13% | 12% |
| 40-44 | 13% | 13% |
| 45-49 | 13% | 13% |
| 50-54 | 12% | 11% |
| 55-59 | 10% | 9% |
| 60-64 | 7% | 6% |
| 65+ | 3% | 3% |
Those working in the occupations with the skill sets required to work as a specialist at HSE have a tendency to be older than the GB average - 45% are over the age of 45, compared to 40% in GB as a whole.
| Ethnic Group | HSE Occupations | GB All Occupations |
|---|---|---|
| White | 93% | 91% |
| BME | 7% | 9% |
93% of those employed in the HSE occupations state that their ethnic background is White, leaving 7% in an ethnic minority - this is higher than the GB average for those in employment, at 91%.
| Disability Status | HSE Occupations | GB All Occupations |
|---|---|---|
| Not disabled | 88% | 87% |
| DDA disabled and work-limiting disabled | 4% | 5% |
| DDA disabled | 6% | 5% |
| Work-limiting disabled only | 2% | 3% |
Looking at disability status, those employed in key HSE occupations are slightly more likely than average to have no disability, though the difference is only by 1%.
The following tables illustrate the people who left HSE in the period 1 April 2010 – 31 March 2011. In total, 386 people left HSE during this period. Of these, 199 left as a result of HSE offering a Voluntary Early Release scheme (in response to the Government's Spending Review and drive to reduce the size of the Civil Service). The following set of tables illustrates the pattern of leavers, both excluding and including those people who left through VER.
| Table 13 - Leavers by age excluding VER | Table 14 - Leavers by age including VER | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excluding VER leavers – 187 people | Including VER leavers – 386 people | |||
| Age range | % Count | Age range | % Count | |
| 16-24 | 4.30% | 16-24 | 2.07% | |
| 25-29 | 9.68% | 25-29 | 4.92% | |
| 30-34 | 13.98 | 30-34 | 7.77% | |
| 35-39 | 5.38% | 35-39 | 5.18% | |
| 40-44 | 13.98% | 40-44 | 12.18% | |
| 45-49 | 2.69% | 45-49 | 4.92% | |
| 50-54 | 6.99 | 50-54 | 11.92% | |
| 55-59 | 7.53% | 55-59 | 24.09% | |
| 60-64 | 29.57% | 60-64 | 22.80% | |
| 65+ | 5.91% | 65+ | 4.15% | |
| Table 15 - Leavers by gender excluding VER | Table 16 - Leavers by gender including VER | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excluding VER leavers – 187 people | Including VER Leavers – 386 people | |||
| Gender | % Count | Gender | % Count | |
| Female | 37.10% | Female | 45.34% | |
| Male | 62.90% | Male | 54.66% | |
| Table 17 - Leavers by ethnicity excluding VER | Table 18 - Leavers by ethnicity including VER | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excluding VER Leavers – 187 people | Including VER Leavers – 386 people | |||
| Ethnicity | % Count | Ethnicity | % Count | |
| BME | 3.23% | BME | 3.89% | |
| White | 50.00% | White | 57.77% | |
| Not stated | 46.77% | Not stated | 38.34% | |
| Table 19 - Leavers by disability excluding VER | Table 20 - Leavers by disability including VER | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excluding VER Leavers – 187 people | Including VER Leavers – 386 people | |||
| Disability | % Count | Disability | % Count | |
| Yes | 5.38% | Yes | 5.70% | |
| No | 77.96% | No | 84.46% | |
| Not stated | 16.67% | Not stated | 9.84% | |
The VER scheme was open for applications from all HSE staff. An equality impact assessment was carried out throughout the 3 stages of the process to ensure that due regard was given to equality and diversity. The assessment indicated that the selection process was fair, open to all staff and that there was no evidence of a negative impact on any group of people with a protected characteristic.
The table below is an extract from the Equality Impact Assessment illustrating the diversity profile of the people considered for early release.
| Diversity profile of staff involved in each of the 3 stages of the VES process | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 - Application (662) | Stage 2 - Consideration (574) | Stage 3 - Released (199) | |||||
| Protected Characteristic | Declared Headcount | Declared % | Declared Headcount | Declared % | Declared Headcount | Declared % | |
| Age | 19 - 29 | 10 | 1.5 | 10 | 1.8 | 1 | 0.5 |
| 30 - 39 | 60 | 9.0 | 49 | 8.6 | 14 | 7.0 | |
| 40 - 49 | 134 | 20.3 | 118 | 20.6 | 35 | 17.6 | |
| 50 -59 | 360 | 54.4 | 313 | 54.6 | 112 | 56.3 | |
| 60+ | 98 | 14.9 | 84 | 14.7 | 37 | 18.6 | |
| Disability | 41 | 6.2 | 34 | 6.0 | 12 | 6.0 | |
| Gender | Female | 336 | 50.8 | 283 | 49.3 | 105 | 53.0 |
| Male | 326 | 49.3 | 291 | 50.6 | 94 | 47.0 | |
| Race | BME | 11 | 1.7 | 8 | 1.4 | 8 | 4.0 |
| White | 651 | 98.3 | 494 | 98.6 | 191 | 96 | |
The following tables illustrate the take-up of learning and development activities during the period 1 April 2010 - 31 March 2011 based on our workforce at that time of 3,602.
| Table 22 - Learning & Development activities by age | Table 23 - Learning & Development activities by gender | Table 24 - Learning & Development activities by ethnicity | Table 25 - Learning & Development activities by disability | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age range | % Take Up | Gender | % Take Up | Ethnicity | % Take Up | Disability | % Take Up | |||
| 16-24 | 51.35% | Female | 51.62% | BME | 72.59% | Yes | 49.64% | |||
| 25-29 | 51.57% | Male | 63.49% | White | 57.28% | No | 57.33% | |||
| 30-34 | 62.42% | Not stated | 57.76% | Not stated | 68.71% | |||||
| 35-39 | 62.95% | |||||||||
| 40-44 | 56.75% | |||||||||
| 45-49 | 58.75% | |||||||||
| 50-54 | 57.17% | |||||||||
| 55-59 | 61.42% | |||||||||
| 60-64 | 46.05% | |||||||||
| 65+ | 45.45% | |||||||||
In HSE, learning and development activities are accessible to all staff. Training needs are identified in a number of ways eg through regular performance reviews; to support a move to a new area of work; as part of a person’s development action plan etc.
HSE's equality and diversity policies are embedded in all aspects of our training programmes; course material is reviewed prior to use to ensure due consideration has been given to equality and diversity issues; and equality and diversity is discussed on a regular basis with our training providers.
Take up of learning and development activities for all our staff is recorded on our electronic HR system. We then analyse the data to identify take-up rates by groups of people with protected characteristics. This data is reviewed in relation to equality and diversity at least annually.
Our booking system for learning and development activities encourages people to flag up any special requirements they may have i.e. in relation to a disability or caring responsibility. Our training providers are made aware of any such issues; course materials are made available in alternative formats; additional support is available during activities; and course feedback forms from participants invite comments on people’s experiences on the event, particularly where requests for reasonable adjustments were made. Any issues raised during events, or via feedback forms are discussed with our training providers as part of regular reviews.
Table 24 shows a higher rate of take-up of learning and development activities for ethnic minority (BME) staff compared to staff who do not have this protected characteristic. During the period 2010/11 HSE ran a Career Development Programme for ethnic minority staff in our lower administrative job bands, who were identified as having the potential to progress. The need for the programme came about following research by our Human Resource team, which showed that, although there were no systemic problems with HR processes, ethnic minority members of staff were still under-represented at our senior job bands.
This was a positive action initiative with the aims that the programme would help HSE by helping to tackle under-representation; develop talented ethnic minority staff; build HSE's reputation as a diverse employer; and encourage other ethnic minority members of staff to develop their careers.
The programme involved a range of activities to support personal development plans, including skills workshops (covering personal, leadership and organisational issues), mentoring, action learning sets, personal development activities and an attachment or project.
The two year programme will end in April 2012.
All our completed Equality Impact Assessments (EIAs) are published annually.
| HSE | Health & Safety Executive |
|---|---|
| Job bands | |
|
|
| BME | Black, minority ethnic |
| HR | Human Resources |
| DDA | Disability Discrimination Act |