Health and Safety Executive

Risk analyses or ‘predictive’ aspects of comah safety reports guidance for explosives sites

The COMAH Safety Report Process for Predictive Assessment of Explosives Sites

Step 1: Identify all the Major Accident Scenarios

The key task in this first part of the exercise is to ensure that all the MAS’s are identified and recorded. To illustrate what is meant by a MAS is, consider a car accident. The major accident (MA) is the car accident, however, it could have resulted from a number of causes e.g. human error, slippy road, mechanical failure, burst tyre etc. Each of these initiating causes (or mechanisms) may lead to a similar event, a car accident, but the outcome (or consequence) will be different and some will be more likely than others (likelihood). In the context of the risk analysis approach described here, the MAS includes the initiating mechanism i.e. a car accident as a result of human error is one MAS, a car accident as a result of mechanical failure is another etc.

The safety report’s description of the MAS identification exercise needs to demonstrate to the Competent Authority (CA) that all MAH’s are taken into account. As such it should be extensive, inclusive, and transparent, otherwise doubt is placed on the analysis which follows. To do this, the safety report should:-

  • identify all the MAH’s and from these develop and list all the potential MAS’s for each individual process/task in each building (generic groups should only be used where the associated operations and the consequences of the events are identical i.e. same building type, same contents, same surrounding population etc. Otherwise the consequences are potentially different.).
  • describe appropriate, suitable, and sufficient methods that were used to identify all events and event sequences/potential causes (including human factors) that could potentially cause MA’s.
  • show that persons of appropriate competence were used to conduct or inform the analysis.
  • describe the scope of the studies, the expertise of the team and the results of the studies, all of which should have been recorded during the assessment process.
  • demonstrate that sufficient emphasis was given to this task.
  • recognise that precautions can fail. All hazards should initially be considered as if no precautions were in place.
  • demonstrate that all MAS’s were included e.g. including very low frequency events (some of which may be treated briefly later in the analysis). This will help the demonstration to the CA on the rigour and process used.
  • describe the range of techniques used. These may include as appropriate; safety reviews, checklists, studies of the causes of previous accidents and incidents, conventional HAZOP studies, as well as "pseudo HAZOP" studies (in which different types of energetic stimuli provide the parameters).

Note: the level of descriptive information detailed in the Safety Report (for all process/operations carried out) must be sufficient to give the CA a full appreciation of the nature of the operations and all their associated hazards.


Directgov - Business Link

23.03.10