Asbestos Liaison Group (ALG) - workplan
Background
With effect from 1 April 2008 the merger of HSC and HSE was effected, the two bodies being replaced by a single board of non-executive directors comprising those who were previously Commissioners. The HSE Board has taken an early decision to review what was previously HSC’s strategy, and has agreed to publish a new strategy by the end of 2008, taking a longer-term view for the next five years.
Prompted by this considerable constitutional change, the new HSE Board took the opportunity at its April 2008 meeting to consider a paper by Giles Denham, HSE Policy Director, on a proposed framework for bodies (including advisory bodies) appointed by the new HSE Board. Although the ALG is not, at present in this category of groups, it is important to consider this framework for the future work of the ALG. This paper can be found at: The way forward for bodies established under governance of the HSE board
The paper describes the background to the existing framework for bodies established by HSC. It suggests that the HSC/E merger provides an opportunity to step back from what it describes as a serial reconstitution process, and to allow consideration of a range of future options for bodies to advise the HSE board. The framework proposes a distinction between those bodies established to manage risks and those established to identify and assess risks. It goes on to discuss potential governance structures for each type of body.
The document 'A Strategy for Workplace Health and Safety in Great Britain to 2010 and beyond' identifies five big strategic issues which must be addressed:
- health;
- HSE’s role in public protection and security;
- the role of LAs;
- a changing economy in a changing world; and
- business and reputation management.
The ALG occupies a key position in delivering outcomes with these issues, much of which are connected with on going work of the ALG. This can be demonstrated by:
- improvements in occupational health provision to supplement the Regulation 22 statutory medical;
- ensuring licensed contractors work ensures public safety by:
- removing risks associated with asbestos (e.g. removal or encapsulation);
- on completion of asbestos work site clearance is carried out ensuring asbestos risk is eliminated;
- working towards improved co-operation between HSE and LAs;
- involvement of clients who not only have a Regulation 4 duty to manage, but also a role of putting out to tender asbestos work and appointing asbestos contractors; and
- improvements in leadership.
It is also worth noting that the Asbestos (Licensing) Regulations 1983 came into force on 1st August 1984. Although subsequently amended, and now revoked and incorporated into, and by, the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006, the 25th anniversary of licensing will occur in 2009. It would be good to recognise this in some way.
Proposal
To develop a strategy for the ALG to work to and embed this into the work of the ALG by adopting a work plan with key performance measures to address the strategic issues. It is important to recognise that other advisory committees, boards and councils, in which the ALG is included, have workplans, work programmes etc.
With over 5000 deaths a year from asbestos it is important to realise that the work of the ALG could be under greater scrutiny. The benefit of having a workplan is that it will be a method of highlighting our work to others, and promote our achievements.
The draft strategy and workplan contain details and actions under specific topics of ALG work.
ALG Strategy 2008 to 2010
- The ALG’s strategy will focus on delivering the issues contained in A Strategy for Workplace Health and Safety in Great Britain to 2010 and beyond within the asbestos industry, in particular;
- by developing closer partnerships;
- by promoting more effective heath and safety management and a sensible health and safety culture; and
- communicating this to all relevant organisations and persons
- The ALG will:
- focus attention on where the industry performs poorly so as to get best results;
- promote greater involvement of workers – recognising that the people best placed to make asbestos work safer are the workers, supervisors and their managers;
- contribute to making information and advice clearer and simpler; and
- champion involving all stakeholders and forging closer working relationships where everyone has a voice and can contribute
The ALG Workplan 2008 – 2010
1. Leadership
All licensed contractors have been invited, and the vast majority have attended ‘the leadership events’ that were held throughout the UK. Now it is time to ensure that they have adopted and implemented the measures they were informed about.
| Actions | Who | How | Performance measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implementing leadership actions for Directors and Board Members as identified in the Institute of Directors (IOD) and the Health and Safety Commission (HSC) Document. | ARCA ACAD and other trade associations |
Raising the issue during audits of members. | Ensuring all member contractors have action plans to deliver, and implementation of the actions. |
| RICS BIFM |
As clients, ensuring contracts are awarded only to those contractors who can demonstrate competence by action plans and measures taken to implement. | Feed back from ARCA and ACAD that contractors are being assessed by clients at tender, with reference to the IOD/HSC leadership actions. | |
| HSE LAs |
Using the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 to ensure IOD/HSC actions are implemented. | Enforcement statistics and licence assessment actions. |
Target dates: All contractors to have action plans by March 2009, and implementation by December 2009.
2. Worker involvement
| Actions | Who | How | Performance measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ensuring all asbestos workers are consulted and involved with key issues affecting their, and others, health and safety. | ARCA ACAD and other trade associations |
Developing the registered asbestos worker database. Ensuring all members use ARCA/ACAD ‘registered workers’, and using the registered worker database to communicate with workers. Consulting employees and their representatives on all matters to do with their health and safety, including involving them in risk assessments. Ensuring no employee of a member is disadvantaged by using their legal right to be consulted. |
All asbestos workers employed by members are registered on the database(s). |
| UCATT UNITE GMB |
Ensure all members are registered and informed of their rights (under both consultation regulations & safety rep/committee regulations). | Guidance and publications aimed at asbestos workers. | |
| HSE LAs |
Consulting with employees and their representatives during inspections and providing them with information; appropriate use of legislation. | Inspection reports and enforcement statistics. |
Target dates: Full implementation by April 2010
3. Competence & training
| Actions | Who | How | Performance measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Developing a competency assessment scheme which can feed into the training needs analysis (TNA) (required for refresher training). | UKATA |
|
Implementation of competency scheme. Award of CSCS cards. |
| ARCA ACAD and other trade associations |
|
Functional database(s) with competency information. | |
| UCATT UNITE GMB |
Ensure workers cooperate in achieving competency standards. | Guidance and publications aimed at asbestos workers. | |
| RICS BIFM |
Provide guidance on tendering for asbestos work. Ensure members when tendering use competency criteria. (As detailed in action 5) |
Guidance and publications |
Target dates: scheme fully implemented during 2010, CSCS cards in 2011
4. Occupational Health Provision
| Actions | Who | How | Performance measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ensuring all asbestos workers receive occupational health medicals, covering, as a minimum, fitness to work issues, to supplement the statutory medical. | ARCA ACAD and other trade associations |
|
Number contactors “signed up to schemes such as CBH.Functional database. |
| UCATT UNITE GMB |
Explaining to workers the benefits of good health and occupational health provision.. | Guidance and publications aimed at asbestos workers. | |
| HSE LAs |
Using the management regulations (Reg 6) in addition to CAR Reg 22 to improve occupational health provision. | Inspection reports and enforcement statistics. |
Target dates: Contractors fully signed up with occupational health provision by December 2010
5. Client Actions
| Actions | Who | How | Performance measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ensuring competency assessments are used in tendering process for licensed asbestos work. | RICS BIFM |
Issuing guidance to members on competency assessments (explaining licences are a minimum requirement). Reference can be made to the ALG strategy/workplan, training certificates / CSCS cards and Regulation 4 of The Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007 for guidance. | Guidance issued. ARCA and ACAD providing evidence that it is being applied. |
Target date: Initial guidance issued in spring 2009, followed by further guidance with input from ARCA, ACAD and UKATA by end 2010.
6. HSE / LA cooperation
| Actions | Who | How | Performance measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ensuring all enforcing inspectors are adequately trained and resourced. | HSE LAs |
HSE to provide and offer training to LAs. | EHOs attending training courses. |
| Ensuring information is shared between HSE and LAs. | HSE LAs |
Exploring with LACORS and LAU methods (e.g. via HELA) how best information can be shared. | Improved training for LAs. Information provision to ALU |
Target date: Implementation 2009 onward
7. Analysts
| Actions | Who | How | Performance measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Improve the quality of analytical work, especially clearance certification. | ATAC | Working with members & UKAS to improve standards and ensure higher standards are achieved and maintained. | UKAS assessment each year |
| Mandatory refresher training | |||
| UKATA | Develop training modules on pre cleaning prior to removal work. | Development of training modules | |
| RICS BIFM |
Ensuring clients appoint independent analysts and contactors (which will include SLHs). | Guidance and publications |
Target date: During 2010
8. Duty to Manage
| Actions | Who | How | Performance measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ensure a minimum training requirement for professional bodies/Trade unions working in or on building. | ATAC UKAS RICS BIFM (APS/UKAS) UCATT UNITEGMB |
Working with members & UKAS/APS to improve standards and ensure higher standards are achieved and maintained. | All Professional bodies involved with buildings to ensure all members are on database and receive annual training. Introduce membership schemes to prove training. |
| UKATA | Develop training modules | Development of training modules | |
| Improve the quality of survey work, | ATAC HSE | Working with members & UKAS to improve standards and ensure higher standards are achieved and maintained. Promote accreditation and certification more robustly than to date |
Reduction in survey complaints and claims |
| UKATA | Develop training modules on surveying and introduce competency assessments | Increase in certification / accreditation | |
| RICS BIFM |
Provide guidance on selecting a surveyor and advise on risks of ill trained non-competent surveyors | Guidance and publications | |
| Ensure all premises are compliant to Regulation 4 | HSE /LAs ATAC BIFM RICS |
Ensuring clients manage asbestos in accordance with L127. | Monitoring of inspection activity. Monitoring of client compliance. |
Target date: During 2010

