Health and Safety Executive

Live issues

On this page you will find the latest health and safety information, news and links. For information published on the live issues page from previous years, please go to the Live issues archive.

Health and safety 'Common Strategy' document revised

5 November 2011

The Food and Drink Manufacture Health and Safety Forum has revised its working document 'A common strategy for improving health and safety in the food and drink manufacturing industries'. This document was originally drawn up between the HSE, the Food and Drink Federation and trades unions almost 20 years ago and was re-written in 2004 when the Forum came into existence.  This latest revision has been a year in preparation and was agreed at a regular meeting of Forum members in October 2011. The Strategy sets out the challenges, objectives, progress to date and proposed action/targets that each Forum partner will undertake to further improve health and safety in the industry.      

Recent cases in court

5 October 2011

The following cases are among many HSE prosecutions that have recently come to court. The first two involve fatalities to workers.

  • Suffolk firm fined after worker crushed to death
    A Suffolk animal feed and pet food manufacturer received a fine of £14,000 plus £20,437 costs following an incident where a factory worker was crushed to death by a pneumatic hatch on a pet food mixing machine. There were many measures the company could have put in place to prevent access to the top of the mixer, such as sufficient guarding or a grille over the sliding hatch.
  • Barnet bread company fined after man dies from fall
    A Barnet-based bread wholesale company and a manager were fined after a man died of injuries sustained when he fell from a stepladder. Two HSE inspectors visited the scene and issued a Prohibition Notice stopping any work at height because of the unsuitability of the access equipment. A stepladder in very poor condition was taken from the bakery. The manager was fined £300 and ordered to pay costs of £200.  
  • Chicken Company fined £230,000 after workers loses most of his hand
    A chicken processing company based in the West Midlands received a fine of £230,000 plus £24,350 costs following two incidents at its Suffolk factory. In one incident a safety guard had been removed from a machine for cleaning and a worker's hand was pulled into two rotating cogs and crushed. In a second incident a month later a worker in a pre-slaughter area for chickens entered an enclosure to clear a blockage and his arm was trapped and broken; the company had fitted a by-pass device to over-ride a safety control. Both incidents were wholly avoidable.
  • Animal feed firm in court over worker's hand injury
    A Lancashire animal feed company received a fine of £7000 plus £3614 costs after a worker lost two fingers when his hand was trapped in a chain and flight conveyor. The employee was trying to remove a blockage when the machine situated on the third floor was switched on in a control room located on the ground floor. This case again highlights the need for proper guarding and isolation procedures to prevent plant starting up unexpectedly.
  • Food firm sentenced over Wigan worker's injuries
    A salad and fresh vegetable packaging company in Wigan received a £10,000 fine plus £2,026 costs after an employee suffered serious injuries to her arm after it became caught in a potato blanching machine. The HSE investigation found the machine had been used without a guard for more than a decade and that rotating rollers were regularly cleaned while they were still spinning. The company has since installed a simple mesh guard over the rollers allowing them to be cleaned without the risk of injury.
  • Perthshire malt company fined after worker loses part of leg
    A national malt company in Perthsire received a fine of £8,000 after a worker had to have the lower part of his leg amputated when he became entangled in a sweep auger inside a grain silo. The HSE investigation found that although the company had procedures in place for working inside silos, they were not safe because of lack of supervision.

Companies in court for rotating machinery accidents

10 June 2011

Two recent accidents have highlighted the risks posed by entanglement on rotating parts of machines. In the first incident, a cleaning operative lost two fingers in a potato processing machine. The worker was reaching inside an outlet pipe to remove a piece of raw potato when he touched a rotating screw, which severed the first two fingers on his left hand. An HSE investigation into the incident found the guard on the machine had not been maintained properly.

The company, which supplies cooked potato ingredients to manufacturers of prepared foods, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 11(1) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 and was fined £10,000 with £5,614 costs. The investigating HSE inspector said "This was a very serious incident, which was entirely preventable. Companies must ensure that they have robust procedures in place to provide and maintain suitable, effective guarding".

HSE Press Release

In the second incident, a worker was making a new metal part for a baked bean packaging machine when he suffered serious injuries to his left hand. The worker was using emery cloth to polish the component on a metal-working machine while it was rotating, when his gloved hand was pulled in. The 65 year-old worker lost his index finger, suffered severe nerve damage to two other fingers and received deep cuts to his hand. An HSE investigation into the incident found that an alternative safe way to polish the metal component could have been used.

The company pleaded guilty to two health and safety offences after it failed to carry out a risk assessment for the work or to provide adequate training. The court imposed a fine of £20,000 along with £4,496 costs. The investigating HSE inspector said "The risk of emery cloth being pulled into rotating metalworking machines is well known. The company failed to assess the risks of the work and make sure suitable safety measures were in place".

HSE Press Release

Controlling exposure to disinfectants

12 May 2011

Disinfectants used to control food contamination by micro-organisms are biocidal chemicals classified as hazardous substances. Although disinfectants used in the food and drink industries are especially selected so that potential residues left on surfaces etc do not taint the food or are harmful to the consumer, many affect the skin, eyes or respiratory system and can be harmful if ingested in sufficient quantity.

Disinfectants commonly used in food and drink manufacture (and catering) include:

  • Surface active agents (surfactants) - these include amphoterics and cationics which are classified as skin, eye and respiratory irritants
  • Alcohols - these are used as skin cleaners and as a transport medium for other active ingredients, but nevertheless can be irritant to eyes, nose and throat
  • Aldehydes - glutaraldehyde is classified as a skin and respiratory sensitisor, formaldehyde is a strong respiratory irritant and is also classified as a category 3 carcinogen
  • Peracetic acid - a powerful oxidising agent used in the food and drink industries which is extremely corrosive
  • Hypochlorite and organic chlorine-releasing compounds - corrosive in their concentrated form and are classified as eye and skin irritants in their dilute form (5<10%).

Guidance on controlling exposure to disinfectants used in the food and drink industries

Pet food giant fined £50,000 after steam scalds workers

10 May 2011

A pet food company was fined after five workers suffered severe burns to their faces, arms and hands when a steam pressure system malfunctioned. The five men were all working on the maintenance of a hydrostat, a high-pressure food-processing machine, when they were hit by an uncontrolled release of steam and boiling water. The HSE investigation found the hydrostat control systems had been replaced prior to the maintenance work but no proper assessment of the risks associated with these modifications was undertaken. The company was fined £50,000 with £22,634 costs for breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act and Regulation 13 of the Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000.

Stonehaven grain company fined after worker's fall

5 May 2011

A Stonehaven animal grain company has been fined after a mill operative preparing animal feed fell five feet from an excavator bucket onto a concrete floor, sustaining head injuries. The HSE investigation found that there was no safe system of work in place for preparing the specialist mix. The investigation also revealed that the company had not carried out a suitable and sufficient assessment of the risks involved because this was a task that was required only occasionally. The company was fined £4,000 after pleading guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc 1974 Act.

The risks of working at height are well known, and free guidance on working safety at height is available at the HSE website:

HSE inspection 2011/12 in food and drink manufacture

15 April 2011

In March 2011 the Government launched 'Good Health and Safety, Good for Everyone' which announced plans for the reform of health and safety in Britain. HSE's workplace inspection plan for 2011/12 recognises this document and greater emphasis will be placed on:

  • inspection of industries with the higher injury rates, in particular meat and poultry processing and dairy processing
  • investigation of serious accidents
  • safety at maintenance operations.

To help control these issues, food and drink manufacturers should continue to address the main causes of injury and occupational ill health through sensible and proportionate risk management.

Company fined after worker hit by forklift truck

8 April 2011

A food processing company has been prosecuted for safety failings after an employee broke his leg when he was struck by a forklift truck. Colchester Magistrates Court heard how a machine operator was struck from behind by a forklift truck carrying a full pallet of boxed rice flour. The HSE investigation found that the movement of pallets in the packing area was inherently unsafe as it involved the unnecessary use of a forklift truck in a heavily congested work area, which limited the driver's vision. The area did not have adequately segregated routes separating pedestrians and vehicles. The company was fined £9,000 and ordered to pay £3,214 in costs.

Court appearances for six food manufacturers

10 March 2011

Although there is a steady year-on-year reduction in injury rates in food and drink manufacture, HSE inspectors still come across situations requiring companies and individuals to appear in court.

Some recent court appearances which followed injuries to workers includes:

  • Lincolnshire food company which packs vegetables for supermarkets fined £15,000 plus costs after a worker was struck by a crate of potatoes which fell from a forklift truck
  • a Lichfield supplier of prepared salads fined £10,000 plus costs after a worker cleaning an inadequately guarded conveyor had his hand and arm drawn into the nip between the belt and the running roller
  • a Hull-based food manufacturer fined £14,000 plus £8,387 costs after two separate incidents, one in which an employee had his left hand amputated when it became trapped in the rotating knives of an industrial meat tenderiser and another in which a fellow worker severed the ends of two fingers feeding film into a food packaging machine
  • a Spalding vegetable grower fined £8,500 plus costs after three workers were hospitalised when an agency worker accidentally mixed two cleaning chemicals which reacted to produce toxic gas 
  • a London bagel bakery fined £2,250 plus £9,719 costs after a worker severed two fingers on his right hand down to his knuckle when attempting to clear a dough blockage on a bagel dividing machine
  • a Brighton meat processing company fined £5,000 plus £4,005 costs after a 16-year old trainee severely injured his arm in a meat mincer which had a disabled safety interlock on the mincer lid   

These cases highlight a number of areas where companies need to monitor safety issues, particularly in machinery safeguarding.

Equality and Human Rights Commission Report - meat and poultry processing industry

28 February 2011

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) published a report in 2010 following its inquiry into recruitment and employment in the meat and poultry processing sector. The report revealed evidence of mistreatment and exploitation of migrant and agency workers in the sector, and made recommendations to the key bodies - supermarkets, agencies, processing firms, government, regulators and unions. EHRC anticipates the report will encourage a systemic change of behaviour and will be following up its recommendations this year. During 2011/12 HSE inspectors will continue to look into the working conditions highlighted in the report during inspection visits.

Kebab company put employees at risk through negligence

21 January 2010

A manufacturer of kebab meat 'towers' has been fined after workers were found using machines designed to skin, cut and mince frozen chunks of meat without the proper safety guards in place.

Bury St Edmunds Magistrates' Court heard how HSE served six prohibition notices between March 2009 and May 2010, ordering the company to stop using a skinning machine, a meat pre-breaker/reducer and a bowl mixer until the appropriate protective devices and guards were fitted and maintained in working order. However the company failed to ensure this work was carried out and it took significant and ongoing intervention by the HSE to prevent the unsafe machines from being used.

A director of the company was fined £4,000 and ordered to pay £10,000 costs, in addition the company was fined £5,000. The investigating HSE inspector said "HSE will proactively prosecute any company exposing workers to these unnecessary risks."


Directgov - Business Link

Updated 14.11.11